Comments on: Apple: We Don’t Need No Stinking Podcast! http://blastfirst.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/apple-we-dont-need-no-stinking-podcast/ mostly music radio and art, some tech, even more junk. Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:03:00 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: jug http://blastfirst.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/apple-we-dont-need-no-stinking-podcast/#comment-15 jug Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:44:50 +0000 http://blastfirst.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/apple-we-dont-need-no-stinking-podcast/#comment-15 I don't think Apple planned it that way, but so many of the early podcasters and podcast directories were making the association between the pod in podcast and iPods-- Apple probably started to believe the hype they didn't even create! I don’t think Apple planned it that way, but so many of the early podcasters and podcast directories were making the association between the pod in podcast and iPods– Apple probably started to believe the hype they didn’t even create!

]]> By: The Rooster http://blastfirst.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/apple-we-dont-need-no-stinking-podcast/#comment-14 The Rooster Thu, 30 Nov 2006 01:39:24 +0000 http://blastfirst.wordpress.com/2006/11/29/apple-we-dont-need-no-stinking-podcast/#comment-14 I thought that it was interesting that in the letter they referred to: "third party use" What are they the second or something? Clearly they think that they have some claim to the work or parts of. I thought that it was interesting that in the letter they referred to:

“third party use”

What are they the second or something? Clearly they think that they have some claim to the work or parts of.

]]>